gedavis.com |
being well during the 2020 pandemic |
||
| friendship via screentime gary e. davis |
May 2020 |
|---|
| April 2020 Genuineness with others can be taken to heart through screentime (which, to my mind, has been true of letters forever). We can be a concerting cultivation across cultures. |
May 2020 So, the elders are learning from their children virtual enjoyments of bonding through screentime. That can be emotionally challenging, but—for me—the relationality is conceptually interesting, because the screen is a visual textuality that exposes the common performative aspect of all human being with others. Digressing for a moment: Natural attitude—lack of pretense, clarity of genuineness—always is “performing oneself,” which is commonly evident to philosophers, psychologists, and anyone in a performance business (like teaching!) or even for ordinary business days!—or, of course, for any fine art. No wonder, then, that a writer would want to emphasize the genuineness of being together through a screen. Yet, “our digital selves” is delightfully ambiguous: oneself having plural selves?: as if interpersonal relating is between avatars troping actually genuine action; and/or oneself varies by interpersonal relationship. (We’re not talking mere role differences here; rather, differences in kinds of relating: friendship, solidarity, kinship, intimacy, formality…altogether being in a continuum of degrees of relating through degrees of nearness (echoed in ethical theory that highlights “near-and-dear” caring over merely social caring). Variability of degree in committed relating is why I’ve focused on self/ [inter]personal differences of a life (being oneself across years) having many relationships that are merely (though aptly) about “our” times over months or some years, between lives that are also essentially separate (even for the best marriages—maybe lasting because a balance is loved). Perhaps Frank Bruni, NYTimes columnist, is distressed about being “not wired to be this alone” because he’s exaggerating the point of bonding via screen, which no one seriously postures as a full substitute for actual others in one’s life. Conversely, he may also be missing that active caring can belong to “textual” intimacy by screen. In any case, creating Life/screentime balance is a matter of respecting s/p differentiation derived from doing so in one’s life: on the one hand, not surrendering oneself to interpersonal relationships (i.e., avoiding self-confounding dependence), not tending toward screentime addiction; on the other hand, not transgressing boundaries in given interpersonal relationships: not objectifying another’s presence (nor requiring fantasy bonding by the other), not abusing another’s trust (no duplicity). Good screentime is symbolic of its correlate in actual interpersonal life, screen derivative of actual, screen allegorical of one’s life. Catherine Price details the craft of online balance in “How to Create Screen-Life Balance,” which is divided into convenient advice sections which pertain to interpersonal life as well:
|
next—> thankfulness |
||
| Be fair. © 2020, gary e. davis |