Project

	open interality in released Flow of immersion gary e. davis	February 3, 2025

Being immersiveness (being [in] immersion) can be represented (retrospected) as Flow, further retrospected (re-represented) as [mere] relating. That can be parsed as relations of relating (i.e., action as process), thereby art- iculating Flow of [immersive] being as componential relating, which is a concept, further analyzable relative to its two-fold difference (components of a relation or a relation of components). But the basis for that analyzable concept is the generative release as if already becoming immersion, though as if phenomena are self-emergent. Such a release may be unknown to persons, but it was there in primal (infant) experience, commonly in childsplay, and common for creativity. We’re born with self-enhancive interest in enhancing phenomenal emergence, decades later for the sake of free associative creativity, even originary inception. Pre-differentiated horizoning becomes differentiated by articulation of there being that time, some fourfold vortexing into focal gravities. That there’s phenomenality as phenomenality abstracts from immersive interality. Sprouting articulation of phenomenality further abstracts from as-if self-emerging. So, I’ve been fluidly expressive of immersion over the years: For love of constel- lating, beyond being here, I wanted and still “want to focus on various modes of interality,” various resorts of articulative being immanently in time, as if everything can be originative, as if released Flow of discerning and making sense may categorially crystallize all evolving of conceivability. I’m given to constellating appellant cohering, as if self-constituting a concept- ual garden through themic sprouts, like some “messy and unpredictable” Inner Child thrilled with incongruous wilds, but in a highly tropical way.

 

Be fair. © 2025, gary e. davis