appellant cohering • gary e. davis • berkeley


	Project

	evincing telic consilience from appellant cohering gary e. davis	May 15, 2026

Life is cyclical across generations, day by day, by era, as more youth grows to generate more highly good sense—or that’s what We work to enable—oriented to more progress, better aging of a cohort generation paying forward for a better Age.

History proves that “the better angels of our nature” do prevail. But inasmuch as that’s not the case at some time and place, We want such a reality to prevail. Indisputabily (in credible terms), that is what good reason is for.

Days go by, always being another chance to influence others well, thereby to pay forward to one’s children, to any child or intimate, any family member, friend, colleague, or neighbor. Anyone can be exemplary of their domain in light of learning which never ends, prospecting futures (whatever the scale), appreciating history, appreciating the ultimate openness of being in Our evolving, venturing, prospecting, modeling.

Yet, reveried promise of comprehensive comprehension to be comprehensive conceptuality—to be conception as comprehensive stance—can’t be axiomatically formal because ultimacy itself is a conception relative to Our openly evolving intelligibility, which also is cosmically anthropic.

Any intimation of comprenhensive comprehension in conception is at best a rigorously consistent tropology implying hope for Our evolving. Comprehensive comprehension is fundamentally philological.

Anyway, more-intelligent life is better than less-intelligent life. Altogether, it gives specific chances for enacive fulfillment of valuing, in light of good receptiveness and good respnsiveness, which in time (cylic through modal recursions) grants more wanting of specific new chances to bear fulfilling days, better days, evolving eras, better generations, better humanity.

The better generative cycles of growing up, achieving a lot, paying forward, and moving on are usefully modeled by a heuristic of 3-fold individuation: [1] talent, [2] exemplifying holistic fittingness of engagement, and [3] influencing well (i.e., being generative, at best lastinging, canonically).

In other words (echoing classical Greeks—and Heidegger), a 3-fold [1] poiesis of constructive action appreciates and generates at best [2] an incluisve fittingness, an implicit synergy (a logos), which [3] evinces (ideally) lasting influence across a generation (an ethos).

Generativity is cyclical across generations of lives through recursive processes within each life.

Altogether, across one’s life, one’s life with innumerable others, across Our culture, our sociality, our politics, and maybe finding some comprehensive conceptuality of it all, a generativity of Our evolving can be modeled usefully as telic cohering through Time (across the contiuum of lifeworld globality).

At an immanent level of 3-fold action, [1] Given valuing (implicit feeling for significance of want) aims for [2] situated Efficacy which is secured (an integrity of integral success) in [3] Fulfillment (which expresses a 3-fold model of intelligence which is empirically well established).

Investment of a life (Self) gives way to personal (shareable) action (interpersonal life: p) aptly for oneself (s) across one’s S/s/p differentiable contiuum of lifeworldly engagement.

Isomorphic potential (recursive—> cyclic) [G—> 1] enacts [E—>2] results [F—> 3]. I know the abstract isomorphicity may seem obscure, but the detail and scale of this involves the entire Project (actually covering several decades, even a half century)

So, that kind of mentality—a generally cyclical, immanently recursive dynamic—backgrounded an earlier “3-fold sense of action” which is isomorphic with an empirically well-founded sense of intelligence whose formality can be only conceptual (not empirically discernible, though mental science is young) because We are speedily evolving mind through progressive worlds in which brains adapt to minds not waiting for biology to catch up, though biological learnability (baseline intelligence) already grants awesome neural plasticity which mental science studies and conceptually prospects.

But minds easily elude empirical modeling. A manifold poiesis of individuation [G—> 1] may capture and advance good* conceptual inclusive fittingness (logos) [E—> 2] which has demic efficacy across the time (ethos) [F—> 3] of one’s life.

Conceptual modeling of that is useful for prospecting a generative consilience of cyclical progress, enactions evolving (beyond retrojective conceptions of happenstantial process), a discernible appellant cohering of minds progressing evolutionary times.

But which minds are the better angels? What is the better humanity? And how best may that—a singular selectivity reflecting authorial interest, of course (but tropologically beyond a 2020 sketch)—be brought into constellated generativity?

Given fruitful address of such questioning, evolving is (I prospect) thereby best modelled as an emergent discursive dynamic of real domain-relative cyclicity (e.g, PCS continuum) composed of manifoldly domainal recursivity (relative to theories of enaction) through [1] relevant aspirations, engaged project-ivity (scaling up to social progress), [2] holistically appeciated locality, [3] etc.

Though the reality of being in Time as Our evolving is conceptual, mapped into eras which have no determined nature, isomorphic modeling can usefully discern real generative recursiveness in response to discerned appellant cohering of gravitational horizons (potentially awing votexual ideality, exemplified by literature on futuring humanity, etc.). Finding [1], creating [2], and [3] showing telic consilience of being in Time for generatve (progressing) humanity is, so to speak, intelligent life designing itself to advance itself against the black cosmos.

Such a conception of Our evolving may seem merely fanciful. But my aim is practical: “Idealism” and “realism” can belong together importantly—showing conceptual inclusive fittingness which is generative—for well (realistically) conceived (idealizing) pragmatic thinking relative to really progressing lives.